WHERE CHURCHES FAIL [199b]

The obvious answer is that they are not meeting the needs of their members. Amongst all the various programmes that churches create, they miss the simplicity of the spiritual need, both to give birth to Christ in them, and to ongoingly nurture the implanted life.

There is a failure to recognise that many are simply going through the motions of being a Christian, because of a lack of deeper understanding that is necessary because of the complexities of today’s society and the many technological advances that help to muddy the spiritual waters. People’s basic need is to be set free and then to maintain that freedom. This should be the churches main aim.

The structure of some churches does not permit the minister/priest/pastor to have power over what takes place. Committees and management board structures often take precedent over spiritual needs and demands. The spiritual leader of the group should not be restricted in any way when delivering a message from the pulpit. He has more potential power than the president of the USA because he is delivering messages from God, and he should not feel the need to follow any other sources other than that which he finds in the Spirit.

In some instances it is the “old school” in the church who maintain a grip on the running of things and who refuse to vary from the old ways, and also who unfortunately at times like the power that they have. So the Spirit is locked out, unable to “heal” the ailments which grow worse as congregations age and young people particularly find no relevance in what is happening (or not happening).

There may also be mismanagement of the finances, due to blind refusal to examine what is and what is not necessary, and a seeming desire to maintain the status quo for whatever reason, which again may be unwillingness to change. Recovery from all of this is simply a matter of listening to the Spirit of God, and bringing the message of life afresh in new and relevant ways, instead of tired old set programmes of bible chapter and verse, as is so often the case. Music in the church also is an indicator of spiritual health [or not], as it corresponds with and promotes worship and spiritual freedom of expression. Playing old hymns that no one knows the words to is a worship killer. [Some hymns are really good].

Preaching and teaching are the essential mechanisms for a soundly based and “alive” church. The measure of success in this can be gauged by any of the individual members satisfaction with their spiritual progress, and by the obvious [or not evident] love in the place.

It should be noted that all the above only refers to “normal” churches, that have the accepted concept of grace. “Legalistic” churches which are still stuck in law concepts may actually have viable congregations because they are still closer to “the flesh” and, “wide is the gate”.

[see also http://www.christiantoday.com/article/3.ways.the.church.has.failed.us/69892.htm ]

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “WHERE CHURCHES FAIL [199b]

  1. The structure of some churches does not permit the minister/priest/pastor to have power over what takes place.
    Good! Too many churches give the m/p/p too much power because the elders/deacons are all yes-men who never turn him down or disagree with him no matter how crazy his requests/demands become. Jesus didn’t come as one who was in power, but as a servant. He gave his authority to his disciples and sent them out – he didn’t view himself as the sole source of teaching and healing.

    In some instances it is the “old school” in the church who maintain a grip on the running of things and who refuse to vary from the old ways, and also who unfortunately at times like the power that they have.
    You hit that nail on the head. I see it out in the local churches – some of them seem like the 1970s or 1980s never ended. But they’re also the emptiest churches. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, and spiritual power corrupts spiritually.

    Playing old hymns that no one knows the words to is a worship killer. [Some hymns are really good].
    But the younger generation doesn’t always have the same music education as their elders and can’t understand the language of hymns and aren’t skilled at singing enough to manage the good ones. They’re not the most confident hymn-singers, but seem to manage just fine with contemporary music.

    Preaching and teaching are the essential mechanisms for a soundly based and “alive” church. The measure of success in this can be gauged by any of the individual members satisfaction with their spiritual progress, and by the obvious [or not evident] love in the place.
    I’d much rather see churches that teach everyone to teach, that lets everyone take their turns preaching. If the goal of every church was to create preachers and teachers rather than satisfied listeners, then I think we’d see the Holy Spirit move through men and women alike in unimaginable ways.

    Like

  2. Reading this I am reminded of how blessed I am to be part of a local church that loves and equips believers with knowledge and wisdom, and sees new radical salvations almost every week. We have groups for every age to participate in and learn from. The relationships are very genuine and God-centered. The music is Spirit-led and all ages participate in corporate worship. Our pastor preaches most Sundays but other members always lead Wednesday services or the lifegroups. I actually avoided church buildings before I started going to my church. I was a Christian but I hated how weird churches had gotten. I am so happy I am where I am at now!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s